I voted on Facebook, too, but I wanted to let you know why I liked #2. I think #1 is quite good and very funny, but I feel like #2 is more clear as to what Robo Corps (RoboCorps?) does. It's obviously a robot, therefore I get the impression that R.C. manufactures robots. With #1, I get the impression that it's a corporation of Robotic Businessmen running their own corporation. Since the mark itself is also more detailed, I worry that it will lose some of its personality when it's reduced in size for, say, a business card. I do kind of like the typeface from #1 better than that in #2. Have you also tried working with just the robot head as a mark? I feel like that would be instantly recognizable and get your point across, well, instantly. This is a fun idea. I'm liking it so far.
Hey thanks for the feedback. Sorry I didn't read it until just now, this blog doesn't really notify me when I have comments. And what's this business with me not being able to see your blog?
I voted on Facebook, too, but I wanted to let you know why I liked #2. I think #1 is quite good and very funny, but I feel like #2 is more clear as to what Robo Corps (RoboCorps?) does. It's obviously a robot, therefore I get the impression that R.C. manufactures robots. With #1, I get the impression that it's a corporation of Robotic Businessmen running their own corporation. Since the mark itself is also more detailed, I worry that it will lose some of its personality when it's reduced in size for, say, a business card. I do kind of like the typeface from #1 better than that in #2. Have you also tried working with just the robot head as a mark? I feel like that would be instantly recognizable and get your point across, well, instantly. This is a fun idea. I'm liking it so far.
ReplyDeleteHey thanks for the feedback. Sorry I didn't read it until just now, this blog doesn't really notify me when I have comments. And what's this business with me not being able to see your blog?
ReplyDelete